Porto Rican & American Insurance v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico

84 P.R. 597
CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico
DecidedFebruary 2, 1962
DocketNo. 2799
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 P.R. 597 (Porto Rican & American Insurance v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porto Rican & American Insurance v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico, 84 P.R. 597 (prsupreme 1962).

Opinion

Judgment

On February 13, 1957 the Superior Court, Ponce Part, rendered judgment in an action of debt brought by Pedro J. Rufián against Enrique I. Moscoso and The Porto Rican and American Insurance Co. sustaining the complaint as to the insurance company and, consequently, ordering it to pay to plaintiff the sum of $768.55, the costs and an additional sum of $300 for attorney’s fees. No pronouncement was made as to the payment of interest notwithstanding the fact that they were claimed in the complaint filed on September 27, 1949 as of the filing date thereof. Appeal was taken from this judgment by the insurance company only. By judgment of this Court rendered on June 29, 1960 the judgment of the trial court was affirmed.

In full satisfaction of the judgment rendered and affirmed on appeal, defendant-appellant deposited with the .clerk of the Superior Court of Ponce the sum of $1,292.94, covering the amount of the judgment, namely, the amounts .of $768.55 as principal, $300 for attorney’s fees, and interest =at the legal rate as of the date judgment was rendered.

Plaintiff filed a motion seeking an order of execution •for the purpose of including an additional sum of $439.46 of interest on the amount of the principal as of March 15, [599]*5991949, the filing date of the complaint.1 It was so ordered by respondent court, and to review this order we issued a¡. writ of certiorari.2

The order appealed from is clearly erroneous. As stated in Rivera v. Creseioni, 77 P.R.R. 43, 51-52 (1954), the only interest which is part of the judgment and recoverable, even though it is not mentioned therein, is that accrued as of the date of the judgment since by provision of law it should be considered automatically as part of said judgment. Section 341 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 32 L.P.R.A. § 1473; cf. Padilla v. Vidal, 71 P.R.R. 483 (1950); Polanco v. Cortés, 66 P.R.R. 718 (1946); Ex parte Franceschi, 53 P.R.R. 72 (1938).

Default interest is not in the same category, but is awarded as an indemnity which is considered a personal. right of the creditor, and which he may waive. Rivera v. Greseioni, supra. In the instant case plaintiff did not appeal from the judgment which made no pronouncement in that respect, and he therefore waived his claim, had the same been in order.3 Cf. Peñagarícano v. Superior Ct.; Nadal, Int., 81 P.R.R. 849 (1960); Mejías v. Superior Ct.; Nadal et als., Ints., 82 P.R.R. 546, 555 (1961).

The order entered by the Superior Court, Ponce Part, on September 15, 1960, as well as the order entered on the following September 23 denying reconsideration, are set aside.

[600]*600It was so decreed and ordered by the Court as witnesses the signature of the Chief Justice.

(s) Luis Negrón Fernández

Chief Justice

I attest:

(s) Ignacio Rivera

General Secretary

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 P.R. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porto-rican-american-insurance-v-superior-court-of-puerto-rico-prsupreme-1962.