Porter v. . Noland Co.
This text of 2 S.E.2d 853 (Porter v. . Noland Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An examination of the record discloses that there was competent evidence to support the findings of the Industrial Commission. Therefore, in accord with the provisions of the act and the uniform decisions of this court, the findings of fact made by the Commission must be held conclusive on appeal and not subject to review. Hildebrand v. Furniture Co., 212 N. C., 100, 193 S. E., 294; Lockey v. Cohen, Goldman & Co., 213 N. C., 356, 196 S. E., 342; Davis v. Mecklenburg County, 214 N. C., 469; Lassiter v. Telephone Co., ante, 227.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 S.E.2d 853, 215 N.C. 724, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-noland-co-nc-1939.