Porter v. Angelone

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Porter v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 F. App'x 465
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2003·No. 03-6158·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6158

BARRY JAY PORTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1025-7)

Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 31, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Jay Porter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Barry Jay Porter appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s order and agree that Porter’s complaint fails to state a

claim. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Porter v. Angelone, No. CA-02-1025-7

(W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter v. Angelone, (4th Cir. 2003).

Porter v. Angelone (Porter v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)