Porter v. Angelone
This text of Porter v. Angelone (Porter v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6158
BARRY JAY PORTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RON ANGELONE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1025-7)
Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 31, 2003
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Jay Porter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Barry Jay Porter appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s order and agree that Porter’s complaint fails to state a
claim. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Porter v. Angelone, No. CA-02-1025-7
(W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Porter v. Angelone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-angelone-ca4-2003.