Porter v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Porter v. Angelone

60 F. App'x 465

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2003·No. No. 03-6158·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Barry Jay Porter appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and agree that Porter’s complaint fails to state a claim. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Porter v. Angelone, No. CA-02-1025-7 (W.D.Va. Dec. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Barry Jay Porter appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and agree that Porter’s complaint fails to state a claim. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Porter v. Angelone, No. CA-02-1025-7 (W.D.Va. Dec. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Porter v. Angelone, 60 F. App'x 465 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

60 F. App'x 465 (Porter v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related