Porter v. American Distilling Co.

Second Circuit

Porter v. American Distilling Co.

157 F.2d 1012

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 4, 1946

DocketNo. 23, Docket 20249

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 F.2d 1012 (Porter v. American Distilling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porter v. American Distilling Co., 157 F.2d 1012 (2d Cir. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The dismissal of Count 3 only affected certain of the many defendants who were sued jointly upon that count. The orders left Count 3 undisposed of as to various other defendants sued jointly and were not therefore final and hence not appealable. Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co., 148 U.S. 262, 13 S.Ct. 590, 37 L.Ed. 443. Studer v. Moore, 2 Cir., 153 F.2d 902; Hunteman v. New Orleans Public Service, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 465; cf. Reeves v. Beardall, 316 U.S. 283, 286, 62 S.Ct. 1085, 86 L.Ed. 1478.

Appeals dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The dismissal of Count 3 only affected certain of the many defendants who were sued jointly upon that count. The orders left Count 3 undisposed of as to various other defendants sued jointly and were not therefore final and hence not appealable. Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co., 148 U.S. 262, 13 S.Ct. 590, 37 L.Ed. 443. Studer v. Moore, 2 Cir., 153 F.2d 902; Hunteman v. New Orleans Public Service, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 465; cf. Reeves v. Beardall, 316 U.S. 283, 286, 62 S.Ct. 1085, 86 L.Ed. 1478.

Appeals dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 F.2d 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-american-distilling-co-ca2-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack