Porrini v. McRizz, LLC

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Vera Porrini, 2:19-CV-03979-ARR-RML Plaintiff Opinion & Order — against — Not for electronic or print McRizz, LLC, et al., publication

Defendants.

ROSS, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated August 1, 2022, from the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-874 (CBA)(LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011), aff’d, 472 F. App’x 73 (2d Cir. 2012) (summary order). Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH)(LB), 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, I approve the settlement agreement as submitted by the parties. See Docket Entry, ECF No. 53. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. SO ORDERED. _______/s/________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge

Dated: August 16, 2022 Brooklyn, New York