Porr v. Clancy

264 A.D.2d 459, 693 N.Y.S.2d 457, 694 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8765
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 18, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition for an opportunity to ballot by providing for a write-in candidate pursuant to Election Law § 6-164 in a primary election to be held on September 14, 1999, for the nomination of the Conservative Party as its candidate for the public office(s) of Mayor and Trustee of the Village of West Haverstraw, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated August 12, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Election Law § 6-164 does not require the pre-existence of a technically deficient designating petition (see, Matter of Coopersmith v Hershberger, 264 AD2d 453 [decided herewith]). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porr v. Clancy, 264 A.D.2d 459, 693 N.Y.S.2d 457, 694 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

264 A.D.2d 459 (Porr v. Clancy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mullane v. Bauer
286 A.D.2d 460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)