Coopersmith v. Hershberger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coopersmith v. Hershberger

264 A.D.2d 453, 694 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8772

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 18, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 264 A.D.2d 453 (Coopersmith v. Hershberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coopersmith v. Hershberger, 264 A.D.2d 453, 694 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition for an opportunity to ballot by providing for a write-in candidate pursuant to Election Law § 6-164 in a primary election to be held on September 14, 1999, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidate for the public office of Town Council of the Town of Clarkstown, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Murphy, J.), dated August 10, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, a petition requesting an opportunity to write in the name of a candidate or candidates pursuant to Election Law § 6-164 does not require the pre-existence of a technically deficient designating petition. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition for an opportunity to ballot by providing for a write-in candidate pursuant to Election Law § 6-164 in a primary election to be held on September 14, 1999, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidate for the public office of Town Council of the Town of Clarkstown, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Murphy, J.), dated August 10, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, a petition requesting an opportunity to write in the name of a candidate or candidates pursuant to Election Law § 6-164 does not require the pre-existence of a technically deficient designating petition. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D.2d 453, 694 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coopersmith-v-hershberger-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack