Coopersmith v. Hershberger

264 A.D.2d 453, 694 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8772
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 18, 1999·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition for an opportunity to ballot by providing for a write-in candidate pursuant to Election Law § 6-164 in a primary election to be held on September 14, 1999, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidate for the public office of Town Council of the Town of Clarkstown, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Murphy, J.), dated August 10, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, a petition requesting an opportunity to write in the name of a candidate or candidates pursuant to Election Law § 6-164 does not require the pre-existence of a technically deficient designating petition. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coopersmith v. Hershberger, 264 A.D.2d 453, 694 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

264 A.D.2d 453 (Coopersmith v. Hershberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mullane v. Bauer
286 A.D.2d 460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Bottini v. Wurbeck
264 A.D.2d 452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Porr v. Clancy
264 A.D.2d 459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)