Poppell v. Thigpen

74 Ga. 412, 1884 Ga. LEXIS 441
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 3, 1884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Where a material part of the evidence set out in the bill of exceptions, filed to the grant of a non-suit, is erased, without any note thereof or statement that it was made by the judge or by counsel . before signing; and where the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions shows on its face, that it was written over something which had first been written and then, erased, without- any identification by the judge, there being one other interlineation which the judge certifies was made by him, the writ of error will be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poppell v. Thigpen, 74 Ga. 412, 1884 Ga. LEXIS 441 (Ga. 1884).

74 Ga. 412 (Poppell v. Thigpen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad
10 S.E. 361 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1889)