Poppell v. Thigpen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Poppell v. Thigpen

74 Ga. 412, 1884 Ga. LEXIS 441

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 3, 1884

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 Ga. 412 (Poppell v. Thigpen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poppell v. Thigpen, 74 Ga. 412, 1884 Ga. LEXIS 441 (Ga. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Where a material part of the evidence set out in the bill of exceptions, filed to the grant of a non-suit, is erased, without any note thereof or statement that it was made by the judge or by counsel . before signing; and where the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions shows on its face, that it was written over something which had first been written and then, erased, without- any identification by the judge, there being one other interlineation which the judge certifies was made by him, the writ of error will be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Where a material part of the evidence set out in the bill of exceptions, filed to the grant of a non-suit, is erased, without any note thereof or statement that it was made by the judge or by counsel . before signing; and where the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions shows on its face, that it was written over something which had first been written and then, erased, without- any identification by the judge, there being one other interlineation which the judge certifies was made by him, the writ of error will be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 Ga. 412, 1884 Ga. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poppell-v-thigpen-ga-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack