Pope v. State
143 S.W. 611, 65 Tex. Crim. 51, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 58
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 20, 1912
DocketNo. 1303.
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases
This text of 143 S.W. 611 (Pope v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pope v. State, 143 S.W. 611, 65 Tex. Crim. 51, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 58 (Tex. 1912).
Opinions
This appeal must be dismissed for want of sufficient recognizance. There is what purports to be a recognizance or appeal bond, which is totally insufficient. For want of a sufficient recognizance the appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Molloy v. State
14 S.W.2d 1032 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Medford v. State
229 S.W. 504 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Nader v. State
219 S.W. 474 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Odell v. State
184 S.W. 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
McDonald v. State
179 S.W. 880 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Latham v. State
172 S.W. 797 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Edwards v. State
172 S.W. 227 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Roberts v. State
168 S.W. 100 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Curry v. State
162 S.W. 851 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Figueroa v. State
159 S.W. 1188 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Wilson v. State
158 S.W. 1114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Ross v. State
160 S.W. 379 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Burnaman v. State
159 S.W. 244 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Comegys v. State
156 S.W. 642 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Cain v. State
153 S.W. 147 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Weaver v. State
150 S.W. 785 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Burman v. State
148 S.W. 757 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Burnam v. State
148 S.W. 757 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Smith v. State
148 S.W. 722 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Whitehead v. State
147 S.W. 583 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
143 S.W. 611, 65 Tex. Crim. 51, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-state-texcrimapp-1912.