Pope v. State

444 So. 2d 1161, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11813
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 1984·No. No. 83-692·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

A defendant may not be found guilty of a violation of probation for failure to pay costs of supervision unless the state demonstrates his financial ability to pay. Edwards v. State, 439 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Lattimore v. State, 433 So.2d 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Smith v. State, 373 So.2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The unrebut-ted testimony before the court established that defendant Pope had never been employed and had no apparent ability to pay. We vacate the finding of violation of probation for failure to pay costs of supervision.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pope v. State, 444 So. 2d 1161, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11813 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

444 So. 2d 1161 (Pope v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bass v. State
473 So. 2d 1367 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Iacono v. State
452 So. 2d 1124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)