Pope v. State

444 So. 2d 1161, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11813
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 1984
DocketNo. 83-692
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 444 So. 2d 1161 (Pope v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pope v. State, 444 So. 2d 1161, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11813 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

A defendant may not be found guilty of a violation of probation for failure to pay costs of supervision unless the state demonstrates his financial ability to pay. Edwards v. State, 439 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Lattimore v. State, 433 So.2d 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Smith v. State, 373 So.2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The unrebut-ted testimony before the court established that defendant Pope had never been employed and had no apparent ability to pay. We vacate the finding of violation of probation for failure to pay costs of supervision.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bass v. State
473 So. 2d 1367 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Iacono v. State
452 So. 2d 1124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 So. 2d 1161, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.