Chestnut v. State

505 So. 2d 1352, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 598, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6913
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 1987·No. No. BK-209·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment and sentence of the lower court is AFFIRMED.

WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., concurs and dissents, with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chestnut v. State, 505 So. 2d 1352, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 598, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6913 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

505 So. 2d 1352 (Chestnut v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adriana Rodriguez v. State of Florida
174 So. 3d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Chestnut v. State
538 So. 2d 820 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Stephens v. State
513 So. 2d 1275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)