Pope v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
This text of 489 N.E.2d 247 (Pope v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal, insofar as taken from so much of the order of the Appellate Division as dismissed part of plaintiffs’ first cause of action, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Order, insofar as it dismissed and severed the second cause of action, affirmed, with costs. A complaint alleging fraud based on a statement of future intention must allege facts sufficient to show that the promisor, at the time the representation was made, never intended to honor the promise (Lanzi v Brooks, 43 NY2d 947).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
489 N.E.2d 247, 66 N.Y.2d 857, 498 N.Y.S.2d 360, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 18309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-new-york-property-insurance-underwriting-assn-ny-1985.