Lanzi v. Brooks
This text of 374 N.E.2d 1247 (Lanzi v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "This determination is without prejudice to an application by appellant to Supreme Court for leave to serve an amended complaint, such application to include a copy of the proposed amended complaint accompanied by a disclosure of the evidentiary facts which would support the claim set forth in the proposed amended complaint and would justify the granting of such leave (cf. CPLR 3211, subd [d]).” [See 43 NY2d 778.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 N.E.2d 1247, 43 N.Y.2d 947, 403 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 1842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanzi-v-brooks-ny-1978.