Pope v. Daggett

Supreme Court

Pope v. Daggett

384 U.S. 33

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 20, 1966

Docket837, Misc

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 384 U.S. 33 (Pope v. Daggett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pope v. Daggett, 384 U.S. 33 (1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the representations of the Solicitor General that the relief petitioner seeks is presently available due to changes in the applicable prison regulations and upon an examination of all of the papers submitted, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas with instructions to dismiss as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the representations of the Solicitor General that the relief petitioner seeks is presently available due to changes in the applicable prison regulations and upon an examination of all of the papers submitted, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas with instructions to dismiss as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

384 U.S. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-daggett-scotus-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack