Pool v. Bunger

75 So. 3d 362, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18593, 2011 WL 5842819
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pool v. Bunger. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12711
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 2011·No. No. 1D10-5040·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Robert Pool, seeks review of the trial court’s Order on Petition[ ] for Modification of Parenting Plan and Petitioner’s Motion to Set Hearing on Petition for Modification of Parenting Plan. We affirm the order without prejudice to Appellant’s right to raise his claim that service of process was invalid in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)(4). See Wolfe v. Stevens, 965 So.2d 1257, 1259 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (noting that a judgment entered without valid service is void for lack of personal jurisdiction and can be collaterally attacked at any time).

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pool v. Bunger, 75 So. 3d 362, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18593, 2011 WL 5842819 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

75 So. 3d 362 (Pool v. Bunger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wolfe v. Stevens
965 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)