Pool v. Bunger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pool v. Bunger

75 So. 3d 355, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18595, 2011 WL 5842784

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pool v. Bunger. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12711 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 2011·No. No. 1D10-3901·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Due to the fact that Petitioner, Robert Pool, has also filed an appeal in which he raises the same arguments raised in his petition for writ of certiorari, we dismiss the certiorari petition. See Majestic Sun Owners’ Ass’n v. Fla. Condos I Ltd. P’ship, 895 So.2d 534, 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (noting that a certiorari petition should be dismissed if there has been an insufficient showing of irreparable harm or material injury that cannot be remedied on appeal).

DISMISSED.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Due to the fact that Petitioner, Robert Pool, has also filed an appeal in which he raises the same arguments raised in his petition for writ of certiorari, we dismiss the certiorari petition. See Majestic Sun Owners’ Ass’n v. Fla. Condos I Ltd. P’ship, 895 So.2d 534, 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (noting that a certiorari petition should be dismissed if there has been an insufficient showing of irreparable harm or material injury that cannot be remedied on appeal).

DISMISSED.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Pool v. Bunger, 75 So. 3d 355, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18595, 2011 WL 5842784 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

75 So. 3d 355 (Pool v. Bunger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related