Pool v. Bunger

75 So. 3d 355, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18595, 2011 WL 5842784
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 22, 2011
DocketNo. 1D10-3901
StatusPublished

This text of 75 So. 3d 355 (Pool v. Bunger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pool v. Bunger, 75 So. 3d 355, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18595, 2011 WL 5842784 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Due to the fact that Petitioner, Robert Pool, has also filed an appeal in which he raises the same arguments raised in his petition for writ of certiorari, we dismiss the certiorari petition. See Majestic Sun Owners’ Ass’n v. Fla. Condos I Ltd. P’ship, 895 So.2d 534, 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (noting that a certiorari petition should be dismissed if there has been an insufficient showing of irreparable harm or material injury that cannot be remedied on appeal).

DISMISSED.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Majestic Sun Owners' Ass'n v. Florida Condos I Ltd. Partnership
895 So. 2d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 So. 3d 355, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18595, 2011 WL 5842784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pool-v-bunger-fladistctapp-2011.