PONZAR v. Peterson

275 S.W.3d 374, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 40, 2009 WL 215364
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 27, 2009·No. ED 91376·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kurt Ponzar appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of his suit on account against Steven Peterson and Virginia Busch and the court’s subsequent denial of Ponzar’s post-trial motion. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PONZAR v. Peterson, 275 S.W.3d 374, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 40, 2009 WL 215364 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

275 S.W.3d 374 (PONZAR v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ortala v. Buthod
275 S.W.3d 374 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)