Ortala v. Buthod

275 S.W.3d 374, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 50, 2009 WL 215365
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 27, 2009·No. ED 91124·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*375 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from the trial court’s judgment in a paternity case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortala v. Buthod, 275 S.W.3d 374, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 50, 2009 WL 215365 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

275 S.W.3d 374 (Ortala v. Buthod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PONZAR v. Peterson
275 S.W.3d 374 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)