Ortala v. Buthod

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ortala v. Buthod

275 S.W.3d 374, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 50, 2009 WL 215365

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 27, 2009

DocketED 91124

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 275 S.W.3d 374 (Ortala v. Buthod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ortala v. Buthod, 275 S.W.3d 374, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 50, 2009 WL 215365 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*375 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from the trial court’s judgment in a paternity case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI