Ponser v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
This text of 803 N.E.2d 814 (Ponser v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} Case Nos. 2003-1730 and 2003-2125 are consolidated.
Case No. 2003-1730
{¶ 2} The discretionary appeal is accepted.
{¶ 3} The judgment against St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company is reversed, sua sponte, on the authority of Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256. The remaining insurance companies, Motorists Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Insurance Company, are to brief the issues.
Case No. 2003-2125
{¶ 4} The certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Licking County is accepted only on the question certified on behalf of Motorists Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Insurance Company, which states:
{¶ 5} “If an insured does not file a wrongful death suit against the tortfeasor with[in] the two year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. [2125.02(D)], is he or she ‘legally entitled to recover damages’ against the tortfeasor under R.C. 3937.18 and, therefore, able to maintain an un[der]insured or uninsured motorists claim[?]”
{¶ 6} The judgments against Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company are, sua sponte, reversed on the authority of Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256. The remaining insurance companies, Motorists Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Insurance Company, are to brief the certified question quoted above.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
803 N.E.2d 814, 101 Ohio St. 3d 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ponser-v-st-paul-fire-marine-insurance-ohio-2004.