Polsky v. VIRNICH

2009 WI 66, 769 N.W.2d 52, 318 Wis. 2d 599, 2009 Wisc. LEXIS 274
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided July 7, 2009·No. 2007AP203·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the judgment of the circuit court. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would affirm. Justice David T. Prosser, Jr., Justice *601 Annette Kingsland Ziegler, and Justice Michael J. Gableman would reverse. Justice Patience Drake Roggensack did not participate.

¶ 2. When a certification or bypass results in a tie vote by this court, the better course of action is to vacate our decision to accept certification or bypass and remand the cause to the court of appeals. State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 191 Wis. 2d 395, 396-97, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995) (remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification); State v. Elam, 195 Wis. 2d 683, 684-85, 538 N.W.2d 249 (1995) (restating rule but declining to remand to court of appeals on a tie vote on bypass because court of appeals had previously decided issue).

¶ 3. Accordingly, we vacate our order granting certification and remand to the court of appeals.

By the Court. — The order granting certification is vacated and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polsky v. VIRNICH, 2009 WI 66, 769 N.W.2d 52, 318 Wis. 2d 599, 2009 Wisc. LEXIS 274 (Wis. 2009).

2009 WI 66 (Polsky v. VIRNICH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond
2015 WI 106 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2015)
Polsky v. Virnich
2011 WI 69 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2011)