Pollock v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pollock v. State

417 So. 2d 306, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20733

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 27, 1982

DocketNo. 81-1938

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 417 So. 2d 306 (Pollock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pollock v. State, 417 So. 2d 306, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20733 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order revoking probation and imposing sentence in this cause is affirmed save for the five (5) year terms of imprisonment imposed for grand larceny and unlawful possession of burglary tools in circuit court case no. 77-27207. The latter sentences are reversed as it is undisputed that the appellant Raymond A. Pollock was never placed on probation for these offenses. Harris v. State, 378 So.2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The evidence presented below was otherwise more than sufficient to satisfy the conscience of the court that the defendant was in violation of his probation as charged; both direct and hearsay testimony, conced-edly admissible here, were presented below and both formed the basis for the revocation in this case. Brill v. State, 159 Fla. 682, 32 So.2d 607 (1947).

The order revoking probation and the sentences imposed thereon are affirmed, save for the five (5) year terms of imprisonment imposed for grand larceny and unlawful possession of burglary tools in circuit court case no. 77-27207, which sentence is hereby reversed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order revoking probation and imposing sentence in this cause is affirmed save for the five (5) year terms of imprisonment imposed for grand larceny and unlawful possession of burglary tools in circuit court case no. 77-27207. The latter sentences are reversed as it is undisputed that the appellant Raymond A. Pollock was never placed on probation for these offenses. Harris v. State, 378 So.2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The evidence presented below was otherwise more than sufficient to satisfy the conscience of the court that the defendant was in violation of his probation as charged; both direct and hearsay testimony, conced-edly admissible here, were presented below and both formed the basis for the revocation in this case. Brill v. State, 159 Fla. 682, 32 So.2d 607 (1947).

The order revoking probation and the sentences imposed thereon are affirmed, save for the five (5) year terms of imprisonment imposed for grand larceny and unlawful possession of burglary tools in circuit court case no. 77-27207, which sentence is hereby reversed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 So. 2d 306, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollock-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack