Fisherman's Paradise, Inc. v. Greenfield

417 So. 2d 306
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 27, 1982
Docket81-1980
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 417 So. 2d 306 (Fisherman's Paradise, Inc. v. Greenfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fisherman's Paradise, Inc. v. Greenfield, 417 So. 2d 306 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

417 So.2d 306 (1982)

FISHERMAN's PARADISE, INC., Appellant,
v.
Nancy GREENFIELD and Melvin Greenfield, Appellees.

No. 81-1980.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 27, 1982.

*307 Underwood, Gillis, Karcher, Reinert & Valle and Carlos E. Casuso, and Thomas Trompeter, Miami, for appellant.

Anderson & Moss, Daniels & Hicks and Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

Appellee Melvin Greenfield took his ten-year-old boat to Fisherman's Paradise for refurbishing. Fisherman's Paradise subcontracted part of the work, including replacement of the refrigerator, to Endeavor Marine. During a boating trip, the refrigerator broke loose from its mounting and injured Mrs. Greenfield. The Greenfields sued both Fisherman's Paradise and Endeavor Marine. They alleged that Fisherman's Paradise was responsible for the negligent installation and included a claim predicated upon strict liability. They also charged Endeavor Marine with negligently installing the refrigerator. Upon motion, the trial court entered summary judgment against both Fisherman's Paradise and Endeavor Marine, denying the motion for summary judgment filed by Fisherman's Paradise. In this appeal, Fisherman's Paradise contends it should not be held liable for negligent acts of Endeavor Marine, because it operated as an independent contractor. Finding that genuine issues of material fact remain to be decided, we reverse the summary judgment.

According to the general rule, an employer is not liable for the negligent acts of an independent contractor because he lacks control over the manner in which the work is performed. 2 Fla.Jur.2d, Agency and Employment § 109 (1977). One of the many exceptions to the general rule, however, occurs when the employer's liability arises from the contractor's negligent performance of inherently dangerous tasks. El Shorafa v. Ruprecht, 345 So.2d 763 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Bialkowicz v. Pan American Condominium No. 3, Inc., 215 So.2d 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So.2d 751 (Fla. 1969). Furthermore, an employer may not escape liability for the creation of an inherently dangerous condition (at least *308 on premises where public use is invited) unless it was not discoverable on reasonable inspection. Mai Kai, Inc. v. Colucci, 205 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1967); Slavin v. Kay, 108 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1959); Cardounel v. Shell Oil Co., 397 So.2d 328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), appeal dismissed, 407 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1981); Forte Towers South, Inc. v. Hill York Sales Corp., 312 So.2d 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Non-delegable duties may result from contractual obligations. Irving v. Doctors Hospital of Lake Worth, Inc., 415 So.2d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) [7 FLW 1179]; Campbell v. Bellman, 293 So.2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Mills v. Krauss, 114 So.2d 817 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 119 So.2d 293 (Fla. 1960); see also Easton v. Weir, 125 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960), cert. denied, 129 So.2d 141 (Fla. 1961) (landlord assumed duty to replace roof; employing an independent contractor did not absolve it of liability); 41 Am.Jur.2d, Independent Contractors § 37 (1968).

Whether Fisherman's Paradise may be held liable for Endeavor's negligent conduct under the foregoing principles is subject to a factual determination. We find no merit in the arguments presented in support of liability on other grounds. Arvida Corp. v. A.J. Industries, Inc., 370 So.2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); see Watson v. Lucerne Machinery & Equipment, Inc., 347 So.2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 352 So.2d 176 (Fla. 1977); Restatement, Torts 2d § 402A (1965); 72 C.J.S. Products Liability § 8 (Supp. 1975). We therefore reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pope v. Winter Park Healthcare Group, Ltd.
939 So. 2d 185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Virtual Computacion y Communicaciones, S.R.L. v. Fischzang
776 So. 2d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Metrolimo, Inc. v. Lamm
666 So. 2d 552 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Monroe Systems v. Intertrans Corp.
650 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
McCall v. Alabama Bruno's, Inc.
647 So. 2d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Carrasquillo v. Holiday Carpet Serv., Inc.
615 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Atchley v. FIRST UNION BK. OF FLORIDA
576 So. 2d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Madison v. Midyette
541 So. 2d 1315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Eastern Refractories Co. v. Forty Eight Insulations, Inc.
668 F. Supp. 183 (S.D. New York, 1987)
City of Coral Gables v. Prats
502 So. 2d 969 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Windham v. Florida Dept. of Transp.
476 So. 2d 735 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Starling v. Saha
451 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
In Re Estate of Starling
451 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 So. 2d 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fishermans-paradise-inc-v-greenfield-fladistctapp-1982.