Pollock v. Couffer

750 So. 2d 659, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13134
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1999·No. Nos. 99-902, 99-903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal Willie Pollock challenges the final judgments of injunction for protection against repeat violence which were entered by the trial court against him upon separate motions filed by appellees, William Couffer and Larry Humphreys. Mr. Pollock contends that the evidence of record does not support the trial court’s rulings; however, he has failed to provide this court with either a transcript of the proceedings below or a stipulated statement of facts pursuant to rule 9.200(b)(4) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. This failure prevents us from reviewing the validity of Mr. Pollock’s claims. Since no error of law is apparent from our review of the final judgments, we must affirm. See Loughridge v. Carillo, 706 So.2d 138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED.

ANTOON, C.J., HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pollock v. Couffer, 750 So. 2d 659, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13134 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

750 So. 2d 659 (Pollock v. Couffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. State
750 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)