Loughridge v. Carillo

706 So. 2d 138, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2230, 1998 WL 95270
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 1998
DocketNo. 97-1336
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 138 (Loughridge v. Carillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loughridge v. Carillo, 706 So. 2d 138, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2230, 1998 WL 95270 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s findings of fact set forth in a final judgment of foreclosure. However, appellant has failed to provide this court with either a transcript of the proceedings below or a stipulated statement of facts pursuant to rule 9.200(b)(4) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The final judgment reveals no apparent error of law. Accordingly, we must affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., and GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pollock v. Couffer
750 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Omni Insurance v. Lacapra
727 So. 2d 1154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 138, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2230, 1998 WL 95270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loughridge-v-carillo-fladistctapp-1998.