Loughridge v. Carillo
This text of 706 So. 2d 138 (Loughridge v. Carillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant challenges the trial court’s findings of fact set forth in a final judgment of foreclosure. However, appellant has failed to provide this court with either a transcript of the proceedings below or a stipulated statement of facts pursuant to rule 9.200(b)(4) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The final judgment reveals no apparent error of law. Accordingly, we must affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 So. 2d 138, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2230, 1998 WL 95270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loughridge-v-carillo-fladistctapp-1998.