Polk Co. v. Mayo
299 U.S. 507, 57 S. Ct. 39
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 12, 1936
DocketNo. 290
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 299 U.S. 507 (Polk Co. v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Polk Co. v. Mayo, 299 U.S. 507, 57 S. Ct. 39 (1936).
Opinion
The motion for leave to amend the statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Payne v. Kansas, 248 U. S. 112; Arnold v. Hanna, 276 U. S. 591; cf. Sligh v. Kirkwood, 237 U. S. 52, 61, 62.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Silver Rose Entertain. v. Clay County
646 So. 2d 246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Moore v. Thompson
126 So. 2d 543 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)
Kelly v. Blackburn
95 So. 2d 260 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Henderson v. Antonacci
62 So. 2d 5 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
299 U.S. 507, 57 S. Ct. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polk-co-v-mayo-scotus-1936.