Polizzi v. City of New York
This text of 227 A.D.2d 493 (Polizzi v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), dated June 20, 1995, which denied his motion to restore to the calendar his prior motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim without prejudice to renew before Justice Hutcherson.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the court did not act improvidently in denying his application without prejudice to renew before Justice Hutcherson since Justice Hutcherson previously addressed the petitioner’s application for the same relief (see, Matter of Polizzi v City of New York, 227 AD2d 492 [decided herewith]). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 A.D.2d 493, 643 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polizzi-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1996.