Polite v. State

588 So. 2d 330, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11365, 1991 WL 231785
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 1991
DocketNo. 90-2914
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 588 So. 2d 330 (Polite v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Polite v. State, 588 So. 2d 330, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11365, 1991 WL 231785 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

Appellant has urged that he entered a negotiated plea of nolo contendere to a charge of grand theft, with the understanding that he would receive a five-year sentence. He appeals the imposition of an eight-year sentence as an habitual felony offender, alleging the trial court erred in imposing a sentence greater than the five-year sentence appellant understood he would receive, without affording appellant an opportunity to withdraw the plea. We affirm, without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a motion to withdraw his plea. See Murray v. State, 566 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

ALLEN, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roper v. State
588 So. 2d 330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
588 So. 2d 330, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11365, 1991 WL 231785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polite-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.