Polite v. State

588 So. 2d 330, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11365, 1991 WL 231785
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1991·No. No. 90-2914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

Appellant has urged that he entered a negotiated plea of nolo contendere to a charge of grand theft, with the understanding that he would receive a five-year sentence. He appeals the imposition of an eight-year sentence as an habitual felony offender, alleging the trial court erred in imposing a sentence greater than the five-year sentence appellant understood he would receive, without affording appellant an opportunity to withdraw the plea. We affirm, without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a motion to withdraw his plea. See Murray v. State, 566 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

ALLEN, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polite v. State, 588 So. 2d 330, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11365, 1991 WL 231785 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

588 So. 2d 330 (Polite v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roper v. State
588 So. 2d 330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)