Polite v. State

537 So. 2d 608, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2595, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5224, 1988 WL 125625
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1988·No. No. 88-1382·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state having confessed error in the enhancement of the appellant’s sentence (no written reasons having been stated) the sentence under review be and the same is hereby reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. See Schmeisser v. State, 527 So.2d 276 (Fla.4th DCA 1988); Francis v. State, 512 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polite v. State, 537 So. 2d 608, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2595, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5224, 1988 WL 125625 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

537 So. 2d 608 (Polite v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United Nat. Bank of Miami v. Airport Plaza Ltd. P'ship
537 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)