Polite v. State

537 So. 2d 608, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2595, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5224, 1988 WL 125625
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 1988
DocketNo. 88-1382
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 537 So. 2d 608 (Polite v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Polite v. State, 537 So. 2d 608, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2595, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5224, 1988 WL 125625 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state having confessed error in the enhancement of the appellant’s sentence (no written reasons having been stated) the sentence under review be and the same is hereby reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. See Schmeisser v. State, 527 So.2d 276 (Fla.4th DCA 1988); Francis v. State, 512 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Nat. Bank of Miami v. Airport Plaza Ltd. P'ship
537 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 So. 2d 608, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2595, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5224, 1988 WL 125625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polite-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.