Polge v. Glazer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Polge v. Glazer

249 A.D. 925, 293 N.Y.S. 504, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10184

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 925 (Polge v. Glazer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polge v. Glazer, 249 A.D. 925, 293 N.Y.S. 504, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $3,000 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the order so appealed from and the judgment are modified accordingly and as so modified the order so appealed from is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. The guardian ad litem is granted permission to stipulate the reduction. All concur, except Thompson,- J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The order denies a motion to set aside the verdict because excessive in an action to recover for damages for personal injuries resulting from being struck by an automobile.) Present —■ Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $3,000 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the order so appealed from and the judgment are modified accordingly and as so modified the order so appealed from is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. The guardian ad litem is granted permission to stipulate the reduction. All concur, except Thompson,- J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The order denies a motion to set aside the verdict because excessive in an action to recover for damages for personal injuries resulting from being struck by an automobile.) Present —■ Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 925, 293 N.Y.S. 504, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polge-v-glazer-nyappdiv-1937.