Polge v. Glazer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Polge v. Glazer

248 A.D. 680

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 680 (Polge v. Glazer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polge v. Glazer, 248 A.D. 680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting new trial affirmed, with costs. Order in respect to costs reversed so far as it relates to the plaintiff Charles Polge, without costs. All concur. (The order sets aside a jury verdict as inadequate in an action for personal injuries resulting from negligent operation of automobile. The second order relates to costs.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting new trial affirmed, with costs. Order in respect to costs reversed so far as it relates to the plaintiff Charles Polge, without costs. All concur. (The order sets aside a jury verdict as inadequate in an action for personal injuries resulting from negligent operation of automobile. The second order relates to costs.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polge-v-glazer-nyappdiv-1936.