Pohl Corporation v. United States

36 F.3d 1110, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18255, 1994 WL 467043
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJuly 13, 1994
Docket94-5105
StatusUnpublished

This text of 36 F.3d 1110 (Pohl Corporation v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pohl Corporation v. United States, 36 F.3d 1110, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18255, 1994 WL 467043 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Opinion

36 F.3d 1110

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
POHL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-5105.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 13, 1994.

29 Fed.Cl. 66.

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pohl Corp. v. United States
29 Fed. Cl. 66 (Federal Claims, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 F.3d 1110, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18255, 1994 WL 467043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pohl-corporation-v-united-states-cafc-1994.