Pohl Corporation v. United States

Federal Circuit

Pohl Corporation v. United States

36 F.3d 1110, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18255, 1994 WL 467043

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 13, 1994·No. 94-5105·Unpublished

Opinion

36 F.3d 1110

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
POHL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-5105.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 13, 1994.

29 Fed.Cl. 66.

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

36 F.3d 1110

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
POHL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-5105.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 13, 1994.

29 Fed.Cl. 66.

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Pohl Corporation v. United States, 36 F.3d 1110, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18255, 1994 WL 467043 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Pincite

36 F.3d 1110 (Pohl Corporation v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related