PMA Companies v. Genox Transportation, Inc.
This text of PMA Companies v. Genox Transportation, Inc. (PMA Companies v. Genox Transportation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
3 . 4 5 6
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PMA COMPANIES, Case No.: □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ □ 12 Plaintiff, . y ORDER GRANTING JOINT 13)" MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 14 || GENOX TRANSPORTATION, INC., et. | JOIN ADDITIONAL PARTIES, al., AMEND PLEADINGS, AND FILE 15 ADDITIONAL PLEADINGS 16 Defendants. \7 || APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, | !Po¢s: 23> 361 18 Cross-Claimant, 19 || v. 20 || L AIRD TRANSPORTATION, LLC, 1 || GENOX TRANSPORTATION, INC. 22 Cross-Defendants. 23 || ,ppLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 24 Third Party Plaintiff,| 25 Vv. : 26 || CLEANCOR LNG, LLC, JASON
28 Third Party Defendants.
1 On May 20, 2021, Plaintiff PMA Companies, Defendant Genox Transportation, Inc., 2 ||Third Party Plaintiff Applied LNG Technologies, LLC and Third Party Defendant 3 ||Cleancor LNG, LLC filed a joint motion for a thirty-day extension of time to join other 4 parties, amend the pleadings, and file additional pleadings. (Doc. 36 at 2.) The parties 5 allege good cause exists to modify the Court’s March 22, 2021 Scheduling Order (Doc. 23) 6 || because Cleancor recently obtained new counsel who are diligently analyzing indemnity 7 |;issues and determining whether new parties should be added. (/d.) Additionally, 8 || Defendant Laird Transportation, LLC has yet to appear. (Id.) 9 | A scheduling order may be modified only upon a showing of good cause and with 10 || the judge’s consent. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4); see, e.g., Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, 11 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992) (stating, “the focus of [the good cause] inquiry is 12 || upon the moving party’s reasons for seeking modification.”). 13 Good cause appearing, the joint motion is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY 14 |} ORDERED that the Court’s March 22, 2021 Scheduling Order is hereby amended as 15 follows: any motion to joint other parties, to amend the pleadings, or to file additional 16 || pleadings shall be filed by June 21,2021. All other dates in the March 22, 2021 Scheduling 17 || Order remain operative. 18 ITIS SO ORDERED. . 19 || Dated: May 21, 2021 Prbeadeiaaes 21 . HON. RUTH BERMUDEZ MONTENEGRO 29 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 . . 24 25 26 ||
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PMA Companies v. Genox Transportation, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pma-companies-v-genox-transportation-inc-casd-2021.