Plotsky v. Plotsky Egg Co.

152 Misc. 297, 273 N.Y.S. 214, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1463
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJuly 3, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 Misc. 297 (Plotsky v. Plotsky Egg Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plotsky v. Plotsky Egg Co., 152 Misc. 297, 273 N.Y.S. 214, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The corporation is estopped, in the absence of fraud or bad faith, to deny the validity of the action of its directors who are also sole stockholders and officers of said corporation, in voting salaries to themselves in their capacity as employees. [298]*298(Shaw v. Ansaldi Co., Inc., 178 App. Div. 589; Chamberlain v. Chamberlain, etc., Inc., 124 Misc. 480; affd., 216 App. Div. 787.)

Judgments reversed, with thirty dollars costs as of one appeal, and judgments directed for plaintiffs as claimed in the summonses.

All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler■ and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sarasota Tile & Terrazzo Corp. v. De Soto Terrazzo Corp.
105 So. 2d 811 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 Misc. 297, 273 N.Y.S. 214, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plotsky-v-plotsky-egg-co-nyappterm-1934.