Plotkin v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
670 N.E.2d 224, 88 N.Y.2d 917, 646 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1755
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that defendant, having stipulated to an increase in damages at Supreme Court, is not a party aggrieved (see, CPLR 5511; Sharrow v Dick Corp., 84 NY2d 976, 977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Plotkin v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 670 N.E.2d 224, 88 N.Y.2d 917, 646 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1755 (N.Y. 1996).
670 N.E.2d 224 (Plotkin v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. Genie Industries, Inc.
929 N.E.2d 380 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
Campos v. Ofman
49 A.D.3d 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Bell v. New York City Transit Authority
844 N.E.2d 788 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)