Bell v. New York City Transit Authority
844 N.E.2d 788, 6 N.Y.3d 770, 811 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 77
This text of 844 N.E.2d 788 (Bell v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell v. New York City Transit Authority, 844 N.E.2d 788, 6 N.Y.3d 770, 811 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 77 (N.Y. 2006).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellants, having stipulated to an increase in damages at Supreme Court, are not parties aggrieved (CPLR 5511; see Plotkin v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 88 NY2d 917 [1996]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Campos v. Ofman
49 A.D.3d 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Spadola v. 260/261 Madison Equities Corp.
6 N.Y.3d 770 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
844 N.E.2d 788, 6 N.Y.3d 770, 811 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-ny-2006.