Bell v. New York City Transit Authority
844 N.E.2d 788, 6 N.Y.3d 770, 811 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 77
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellants, having stipulated to an increase in damages at Supreme Court, are not parties aggrieved (CPLR 5511; see Plotkin v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 88 NY2d 917 [1996]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. New York City Transit Authority, 844 N.E.2d 788, 6 N.Y.3d 770, 811 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 77 (N.Y. 2006).
844 N.E.2d 788 (Bell v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campos v. Ofman
49 A.D.3d 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Spadola v. 260/261 Madison Equities Corp.
6 N.Y.3d 770 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)