Pless v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1074
COY E. PLESS, d/b/a Lakeside Chiropractic, d/b/a Complete Wellness Medical Center, d/b/a Anderson Wellness Center, d/b/a CEP Jr, Incorporated, d/b/a Chiropractic of America, d/b/a Pless Clinic of Chiropractic,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CAROLINA FIRST BANK; DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED; MASSACHUSETTS INVESTORS TRUST A; PALMETTO GOVERNMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATORS, LLC,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:05-cv-02974-GRA)
Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 15, 2006
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Coy E. Pless, Appellant Pro Se. David I. Pincus, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; George John Conits, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Coy E. Pless, Jr., appeals from the district court orders
dismissing his motion to quash several Internal Revenue Service
summonses and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Pless, No. 6:05-cv-02974-GRA (D.S.C. Nov. 18 & Dec. 6,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pless v. United States (Pless v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.