Pless v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Pless v. United States

200 F. App'x 188

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 15, 2006·No. No. 06-1074·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Coy E. Pless, Jr., appeals from the district court orders dismissing his motion to quash several Internal Revenue Service summonses and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Pless, No. 6:05-cv-02974-GRA (D.S.C. Nov. 18 & Dec. 6, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Coy E. Pless, Jr., appeals from the district court orders dismissing his motion to quash several Internal Revenue Service summonses and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Pless, No. 6:05-cv-02974-GRA (D.S.C. Nov. 18 & Dec. 6, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Pless v. United States, 200 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

200 F. App'x 188 (Pless v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.