Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Pless v. State

Pless v. State

117 S.E. 770, 30 Ga. App. 277, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 399
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1923
Docket14403
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 S.E. 770 (Pless v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pless v. State, 117 S.E. 770, 30 Ga. App. 277, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 399 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The bill of exceptions shows that two separate cases against the same defendant were by agreement tried together; that there were two separate verdicts of guilty, two separate judgments, [278]*278two separate motions for a new trial, and two separate orders overruling the motions. The defendant seeks in this bill of exceptions to have both of these judgments reversed. This cannot be done. Fillingame v. State, 27 Ga. App. 764 (109 S. E. 916); Bridges v. State, 27 Ga. App. 767 (110 S. E. 412).

Decided May 15, 1923. II. A. Allen, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shearer v. State
120 S.E. 19 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 770, 30 Ga. App. 277, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pless-v-state-gactapp-1923.