Bridges v. State

110 S.E. 412, 27 Ga. App. 767, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 409
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1921
Docket12897
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 110 S.E. 412 (Bridges v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bridges v. State, 110 S.E. 412, 27 Ga. App. 767, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 409 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The bill of exceptions in this case shows that two separate oases against the same defendant were by consent tried together, and that there were two separate verdicts of guilty, and two judgments, and by one bill of exceptions the defendant seeks to have both of these judgments set aside. There is no authority of law for excepting in the same motion for a new trial to the rendition of two verdicts upon the trial of two separate criminal cases. See Fillingame v. State, 27 Ga. App. 764 (109 S. E. 916), and cases there cited.

Writ of error dismisse.1.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dempsey v. State
119 S.E.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Johnson v. State
66 S.E.2d 132 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Holtzendore v. State
78 Ga. App. 801 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Holtzendorf v. State
52 S.E.2d 624 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Williams v. Smith
17 S.E.2d 206 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Fortson v. State
164 S.E. 90 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Askew v. Powell
117 S.E. 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Pless v. State
117 S.E. 770 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 412, 27 Ga. App. 767, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridges-v-state-gactapp-1921.