Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bridges v. State

Bridges v. State

110 S.E. 412, 27 Ga. App. 767, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 409
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 13, 1921·No. 12897·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The bill of exceptions in this case shows that two separate oases against the same defendant were by consent tried together, and that there were two separate verdicts of guilty, and two judgments, and by one bill of exceptions the defendant seeks to have both of these judgments set aside. There is no authority of law for excepting in the same motion for a new trial to the rendition of two verdicts upon the trial of two separate criminal cases. See Fillingame v. State, 27 Ga. App. 764 (109 S. E. 916), and cases there cited.

Writ of error dismisse.1.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bridges v. State, 110 S.E. 412, 27 Ga. App. 767, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 409 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

110 S.E. 412 (Bridges v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dempsey v. State
119 S.E.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Johnson v. State
66 S.E.2d 132 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Holtzendore v. State
78 Ga. App. 801 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Holtzendorf v. State
52 S.E.2d 624 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Williams v. Smith
17 S.E.2d 206 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Fortson v. State
164 S.E. 90 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Askew v. Powell
117 S.E. 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Pless v. State
117 S.E. 770 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)