Pleasant Valley Ranch Co. v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 335, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2433
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJuly 14, 1925
DocketDocket No. 1315.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 B.T.A. 335 (Pleasant Valley Ranch Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pleasant Valley Ranch Co. v. Commissioner, 2 B.T.A. 335, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2433 (bta 1925).

Opinion

OPINION.

Phillips:

This is one of the many cases coming before this Board where it is necessary to approve the determination of the Commissioner, not because it appears that such determination is correct, but because of the failure of the taxpayer or his counsel to support his contentions by proof. In filing its income-tax return the taxpayer claimed a closing inventory of $40,065 less than its opening inventory for the year 1918. The Commissioner disallowed such decrease and valued the inventory at the close of the year at the same figure as at the beginning of the year. The taxpayer in his petition alleged that in doing so the Commissioner committed error. Upon the hearing counsel for the taxpayer rested his case after proving a decrease of 420 head of cattle during the year. The Commissioner introduced no evidence and rested. It was explained to counsel for the taxpayer that this Board had before it none of the records [336]*336of tbe Bureau of Internal Revenue and only sucb evidence as had been adduced before it, and counsel for the taxpayer was thereupon-given permission to reopen his case for the purpose of proving the inventory values. Counsel availed himself of this opportunity only to the extent of proving a part of the inventory. The law imposes upon this Board the duty of making written findings of fact and it is impossible to find facts in the absence of evidence.

The burden of proof is upon the taxpayer, and in the absence of proof that the determination of the Commissioner was incorrect,, his determination must be approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schuler v. Commissioner
29 B.T.A. 415 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1933)
Pleasant Valley Ranch Co. v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 335 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 B.T.A. 335, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pleasant-valley-ranch-co-v-commissioner-bta-1925.