Plate v. Detroit Fidelity Surety Co.

201 N.W. 459, 229 Mich. 489, 1924 Mich. LEXIS 919
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Plate v. Detroit Fidelity Surety Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 Mich. 482
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 31, 1924·No. Docket No. 90.·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff Carrie E. Plate is administratrix of the estate of her father, Edson L. Potter; she is joined in this suit with her mother, Melvina M. Potter. She is plaintiff individually inPlate v. Detroit Fidelity Surety Co., ante, 482, handed down herewith. The sale of stock of defendant company to Mr. and Mrs. Potter was made by the same agent and upon the same representations as in the other case; the same questions are involved in this case as in that one and this case is controlled by the opinion in that case.

For the reasons stated by Mr. Justice WIEST in that case, the decree in this case will be affirmed. Plaintiffs will recover costs in this court.

CLARK, C.J., and McDONALD, SHARPE, STEERE, and WIEST, JJ., concurred. BIRD and MOORE, JJ., did not sit. *Page 490

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plate v. Detroit Fidelity Surety Co., 201 N.W. 459, 229 Mich. 489, 1924 Mich. LEXIS 919 (Mich. 1924).

201 N.W. 459 (Plate v. Detroit Fidelity Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.