Plate v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Plate v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.

229 Mich. 489

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 31, 1924

DocketDocket No. 90

StatusPublished

This text of 229 Mich. 489 (Plate v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plate v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co., 229 Mich. 489 (Mich. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Fellows, J.

Plaintiff Carrie E. Plate is administratrix of the estate of her father, Edson L. Potter; she is joined in this suit with her mother, Melvina M. Potter. She is plaintiff individually in Plate v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co., ante, 482, handed down herewith. The sale of stock of defendant company to Mr. and Mrs. Potter was made by the same agent and upon the same representations as in the other case; the same questions are involved in this case as in that one and this case is controlled by the opinion in that case.

For the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Wiest in that case, the decree in this case will be affirmed. Plaintiffs will recover costs in this court.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Sharpe, Steere, and Wiest, JJ., concurred. Bird and Moore, JJ., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fellows, J.

Plaintiff Carrie E. Plate is administratrix of the estate of her father, Edson L. Potter; she is joined in this suit with her mother, Melvina M. Potter. She is plaintiff individually in Plate v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co., ante, 482, handed down herewith. The sale of stock of defendant company to Mr. and Mrs. Potter was made by the same agent and upon the same representations as in the other case; the same questions are involved in this case as in that one and this case is controlled by the opinion in that case.

For the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Wiest in that case, the decree in this case will be affirmed. Plaintiffs will recover costs in this court.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Sharpe, Steere, and Wiest, JJ., concurred. Bird and Moore, JJ., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 Mich. 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plate-v-detroit-fidelity-surety-co-mich-1924.