Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

2 N.E.3d 285, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1493
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 24, 2014·No. 2013-1552·Published

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of habeas corpus.

Upon consideration of petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2 N.E.3d 285, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1493 (Ohio 2014).

2 N.E.3d 285 (Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.