Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

Ohio Supreme Court

Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 24, 2013

Docket2013-1552

StatusPublished

This text of 999 N.E.2d 693 (Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Todd Plassman. Sua sponte, the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered.

Respondent shall file a return of writ within 21 days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within ten days after the return is filed. Petitioner’s physical presence before the court is not required.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger and French, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Todd Plassman. Sua sponte, the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered.

Respondent shall file a return of writ within 21 days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within ten days after the return is filed. Petitioner’s physical presence before the court is not required.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger and French, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plassman-v-ohio-adult-parole-auth-ohio-2013.