Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

Ohio Supreme Court

Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 24, 2013·No. 2013-1552·Published

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Todd Plassman. Sua sponte, the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered.

Respondent shall file a return of writ within 21 days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within ten days after the return is filed. Petitioner’s physical presence before the court is not required.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger and French, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Todd Plassman. Sua sponte, the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered.

Respondent shall file a return of writ within 21 days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within ten days after the return is filed. Petitioner’s physical presence before the court is not required.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger and French, JJ., dissent.

Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

999 N.E.2d 693 (Plassman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.