Plantation Pipe Line Company v. City of Bremen

170 S.E.2d 398, 225 Ga. 607, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 583
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 29, 1969
Docket25415, 25416
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 170 S.E.2d 398 (Plantation Pipe Line Company v. City of Bremen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plantation Pipe Line Company v. City of Bremen, 170 S.E.2d 398, 225 Ga. 607, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 583 (Ga. 1969).

Opinion

Nichols, Justice.

Plantation Pipe Line Company filed a petition for declaratory judgment against the City of Bremen in which it sought to have described Acts of the General Assembly as well as ordinances adopted pursuant thereto declared unconstitutional. The members of the school board of Carroll County filed an intervention in which they also sought a declaration that a described Act of the General *608 Assembly and ordinances adopted pursuant thereto were unconstitutional. The defendant city filed a motion to dismiss which included the ground that the petition failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and the trial court, after hearing argument, dismissed the plaintiff’s petition as well as the intervention. Held:

Argued September 9, 1969 Decided September 29, 1969. Howe ■& Murphy, Harold L. Murphy, for appellant (Case No. 25415). Thomas B. Murphy, Tisinger & Tisinger, David H. Tisinger, for appellees. Tisinger & Tisinger, David H. Tisinger, for appellants (Case No. 25416). Thomas B. Murphy, Howe & Murphy, Harold L. Murphy, for appellees. James T. McIntyre, Jr., for party at interest not party to record.

Under the decision of this court in Williams v. Kaylor, 218 Ga. 576 (129 SE2d 791), construing the Act of. 1945 (Ga. L. 1945, pp. 137, 138; Code Ann. § 110-1106), the trial court was without jurisdiction to render any judgment except one of dismissal inasmuch as the Attorney General was not served with a copy of the proceeding seeking a declaratory judgment declaring statutes of the State unconstitutional. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court complained of in each appeal must be affirmed without a decision upon the constitutionality of the Act attacked.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gardner v. Board of County Commissioners
576 A.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1990)
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Smith
1980 OK 74 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1980)
Commissioners Court of Harris County v. Peoples National Utility Co.
538 S.W.2d 228 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Board of Education of Hall County v. Shirley
177 S.E.2d 711 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
Pharris v. Mayor &C. of Jefferson
175 S.E.2d 845 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.E.2d 398, 225 Ga. 607, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plantation-pipe-line-company-v-city-of-bremen-ga-1969.