Board of Education of Hall County v. Shirley

177 S.E.2d 711, 226 Ga. 770, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 679
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 8, 1970
Docket26037
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 177 S.E.2d 711 (Board of Education of Hall County v. Shirley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Education of Hall County v. Shirley, 177 S.E.2d 711, 226 Ga. 770, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 679 (Ga. 1970).

Opinion

Nichols, Justice.

The plaintiffs filed the present action to have declared unconstitutional a provision of the Constitution of this State providing for the election of four of five members of the Hall County Board of Education by districts which districts were constituted so as to violate the doctrine of “one man — one vote” announced in decisions of the United States Supreme Court. Other relief dependent upon the above declaration was also sought.

1. “The requirement of our statute embodied in Code Ann. § 110-1106 (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 137, 138) requiring the Attorney General to be served with a copy of the proceeding in declaratory judgment cases where there is an attack made upon the constitutionality of a statute of the State is mandatory and jurisdictional.” Williams v. Kaylor, 218 Ga. 576 (129 SE2d 791). See also Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. City of Bremen, 225 Ga. 607 (170 SE2d 398).

2. The word “statute” in the Declaratory Judgment Act, supra, of necessity includes a provision of the Constitution of the State of Georgia. Compare American Federation of Labor v. Watson, 327 U. S. 582 (66 SC 761, 90 LE 873).

3. The record in the present case is devoid of any showing of service upon the Attorney General, and the trial court was without jurisdiction of the action. Accordingly, the judgment *771 of the trial court declaring a provision of the Constitution of Georgia unconstitutional as in conflict with the “one man— one vote” rule announced by the Supreme Court and granting additional relief must be reversed.

Argued September 16, 1970 Decided October 8, 1970. Perry S. Oliver, Palmour & Palmour, J. E. Palmour, Jr., for appellants. Reed & Dunn, Robert J. Reed,, R. Elliott Dunn, Jr., for appellees.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Deal
723 S.E.2d 901 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
Alcovy Shores Water & Sewerage Authority v. Jasper County
626 S.E.2d 560 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Guy v. Judicial Nominating Commission
659 A.2d 777 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1995)
Garner v. State
330 S.E.2d 750 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Total Vending Services, Inc. v. Gwinnett County
276 S.E.2d 89 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Total Vending Service, Inc. v. Gwinnett County
264 S.E.2d 574 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Daniel v. Federal National Mortgage Assn.
202 S.E.2d 388 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
McClure v. Shirley
183 S.E.2d 385 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 S.E.2d 711, 226 Ga. 770, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-of-hall-county-v-shirley-ga-1970.