Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey

502 U.S. 1056
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 21, 1992·No. No. 91-744; No. 91-902·Published

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following questions:

[1057] “1. Did the Court of Appeals err in upholding the constitutionality of the following provisions of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act:
“a. 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3208 (1990) (definition of medical emergency)
“b. 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3205 (1990) (informed consent)
“c. 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3206 (1990) (parental consent)
“d. 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §§3207 and 3214 (1990) (reporting requirements)?
“2. Did the Court of Appeals err in holding 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3209 (1990) (spousal notice) unconstitutional?” Cases consolidated and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 947 F. 2d 682.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 502 U.S. 1056 (1992).

502 U.S. 1056 (Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 3208
Pennsylvania 18 § 3208
§ 3205
Pennsylvania 18 § 3205
§ 3206
Pennsylvania 18 § 3206
§ 3207
Pennsylvania 18 § 3207
§ 3209
Pennsylvania 18 § 3209