Pizzuto v. Randolph

399 F. App'x 843
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2010·No. No. 10-1663·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carol L. Pizzuto appeals the district court’s orders staying discovery, denying her motion to remand, and granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pizzuto v. Randolph, No. 5:10-cv-00017-FPS, 2010 WL 2402861 (N.D.W. Va. June 3, 2010; June 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pizzuto v. Randolph, 399 F. App'x 843 (4th Cir. 2010).

399 F. App'x 843 (Pizzuto v. Randolph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.